Sacraments….
Lutherans
are “sacramental” as are Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Anglican
Christians. Understanding such requires
a solid understanding of the concepts of God as love and God as the active one,
that God blesses us (see Session One).
“Sacrament”
is a theological term loosely referring to any “means of grace.” A “means of grace” is whatever GOD uses to
bring faith and power into our lives a means to bless. When the Gospel message of the Bible is preached
or read or sung or told – it becomes a “tool” of God, something God can use to
GIVE us the “gift of faith” and to guide and empower and bless our lives. Yes, our reading or listening or singing
involves some “work” on our part but that’s not the point – GOD is using this
like a carpenter using a tool to create something beautiful. While MANY things can be “means of grace” in
this loose sense, historically Christians have especially referenced Word and
Sacraments as the “Means of Grace.” They
are “tools in the hands of the Carpenter” for the granting and strengthening of
faith and life.
In
and of themselves, they are rather powerless and benign. Like a hammer just lying there. But place that hammer in the hands of a
skilled carpenter and GREAT things happen!
In the same way, the Bible may seem only like words, Baptism only like
water, the Eucharist only like bread and wine.
Ah, but they are in the hands of the Carpenter! Who wishes to BLESS us!
In
the past 500 years or so, a small minority of Christians have replaced this
concept of God blessing us with and opposite concept: “Ordinances” (often
referring to the same things). The focus
is placed on man to some extent, where man is the active and critical factor,
the emphasis becomes less on God’s unmerited grace and mercy and more on OUR
“obedience” and God’s reward of that, thus the redefinition as “Ordinances”
(not something God does for us in love but something we do for God in obedience
in hopes of reward); OUR jumping through hoops in hopes of pleasing God. Some
Christians “talk past” each other on these points because of this different
understanding of God and His grace/mercy.
“Sacrament”
is a theological term; we define it as especially something instituted by
Christ that utilizes some means in order to offer or seal His gift of faith and
His power in our lives. Some define the
word a bit differently. Lutherans don’t
dogmatically number them, but historically
(not dogmatically) we’ve spoken especially of two: Baptism and Holy Communion. These are gifts of God, means of grace,
tools in the hands of God, means He uses to bless us.
Baptism…
The
practice of Baptism actually began among the Jews long before Jesus, and there
were several forms of it common in Jesus’ day.
In a sense, Jesus adopts these, combines them, and fulfills them –
making them more than something that points to a promise but actually grants
that promise.
The
word baptizo simply means “to wash.”
It includes a concept of forgiveness and initiation. Baptism may be thought of as a Rite of
Adoption, an embrace into the “Family of God” as well as a washing away of
sins. Baptism can be thought of as
“God’s way of adopting us.”
Jesus
instituted the Sacrament in Matthew 28:19, “Go and make disciples of all people
– Baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy
Spirit…”
Blessings….
There
are many blessings associated with Baptism.
Among them:
“Be
baptized every one of you…so that your sins are forgiven, and you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit.” Acts 2:38-39
“Be
baptized and wash away your sins, calling on His name.” Acts 22:16
“This
water symbolizes Baptism that now saves you.”
1 Peter 3:21
“All
of you who are baptized into Christ have clothed yourself with Christ.” Galatians 3:27
“For
by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body.” 1
Corinthians 12:13
Of
course, the water is not effectual in and of itself (it is just water!), but it
is powerful and creative in the hands of God!
Just as a hammer does nothing in and of itself – but rather the skilled
man using it, so water does nothing in and of itself – but rather in the
loving, giving, merciful and giving hand of God. Luther stressed that the “power” of Baptism
comes from the word and promise of God – not the H20 and certainly not in the
pastor administering it. It’s a “tool in
the hands of the Carpenter.”
What About Infant
Baptism?
The
Bible is silent on the matter of age.
Some
note the very INCLUSIVE language associated with the Sacrament (Matthew 28:19,
Acts 2:38-39, Acts 16:15, etc.) and the promise that children can believe
(Matthew 18:6, Mark 10:13-15, etc.).
They view the Sacrament as an ACT OF GOD, a blessing, and note that such
doesn’t require our worthiness but only His mercy. Today, about 75% of Christians
welcome children (it was 100% before the late 16th Century).
Some
parents reject this gift for their children because they want the child “to
decide for himself.” However, parents
often make responsible decisions for their children. Parents seldom do this in
other areas of life; do they ask their child if the child wants to get his
cavity filled at the dentist or wants to go to school on Monday morning? Some parents also misunderstand that Baptism
is not joining a denomination or even a church, it is being embraced into the
Family of God. He or she will still need
to ‘decide’ what church or denomination they desire to join (this is done at
Confirmation – often in the teen years).
We should not disobey God and withhold this blessing from our children
any more than national citizenship or any other blessing.
Sprinkling, Dipping
or Immersing?
Scripture
is silent on this point.
It’s
likely that Jesus was immersed (of course, His was a Jewish/Old Testament rite)
but there’s no indication that is the only acceptable or permissible
means. We know that all forms of
applying water was practiced and permitted as early as 110 AD. The great majority of Christians simply see
this as a “non-issue.” It’s not the amount of water that is critical but rather
Who is “using” this and for what? For
most, the issue of “how much” matters no more with Baptism than with
Communion. However, there have been some
since the late 16th Century coming out of the Anabaptist tradition
that consider immersion to be required.
Lutherans disagree. We see
nothing wrong with full immersion, we just don’t see it as mandated; since
Scripture is silent on this, so are we.
Is Baptism Necessity?
We
argue that Baptism IS necessary in the sense that Christ commands it and it is
a “means of grace” we should not reject.
It is not essential in the sense that if we don’t receive this Sacrament
we CANNOT have faith in Christ or be saved.
We note in Luke 23:43 that Jesus promises the thief on the cross that he
is saved but he was never baptized, but we also note the rebuke of the
Pharisees that rejected baptism. We
should not neglect or reject this Gift of God, but on the other hand, one CAN
come to faith in spite of not receiving it since God is not “bound” to it.
A Word About Godparents
and Sponsors…
Originally,
these “witnessed” the Baptism and promised to raise the child in the Lord
should the child loose his parents (and usually all other close
relatives). Today, this need rarely
arises and the issue of raising children is now a matter of legal
documents. So, today they continue to
serve as witnesses but especially serve as encouragers – helping, supporting
and encouraging the parents in the spiritual upbringing and education of the child. They are completely optional and need not be
married or Lutherans, but they should be ACTIVE, strong Christians and should
understand that they are making an 18 year long commitment to assist and
support you in the Christian upbringing of the child.
Discussions,
Questions and Footnotes….
1. Back in Session One, we studied the
“foundations” of Christianity and noted that much assumes and depends on
them. One of those foundations is that
GOD is the active one, we aren’t! How
does that apply in the topic of Baptism?
IF we assume that WE are the active one, that what matters is what WE do
for GOD in obedience, then is infant Baptism going to be problematic
(especially if the little one sleeps through the whole thing, as they often
do)? How do you see the “Adult vs.
Infant Baptism” not a conflict in understanding Baptism but a variance in how
we understand our relationship to God?
2. Literal wars have been fought over how many
Sacraments there are! One English queen
rather quickly lost her head over this one!
Lutherans have “opted out” of this fight. The term never appears in Scripture or the
earliest Church Fathers, and there is no numeration of such in Scripture. While the CONCEPT of God using means
(“tools”) to bring about His grace and will in our hearts and lives is very biblical,
“Sacrament” is OUR term and WE give it OUR definition (not all denominations
define the term the same way). We are
strongly “Sacramental” because we stress God as the active one and fully
embrace His means of grace. Also because
we place great emphasis on the promises, blessings and importance of Baptism
and Communion. But we’ve simply stayed
out of the historical “fight” over HOW MANY there are. Although we leave this officially alone, many
Lutherans are pretty comfortable with the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican stress
on all kinds of things being “sacramental” (means of grace, tools in the hands
of the Carpenter), what is or is not specifically a Sacrament largely depends
on how you define the word. Our focus
should be on God’s blessings, not our numbers.
3. The origins of “Godparents” rests in two
things: the practical need to have
someone to raise the child IN THE LORD should the parents (and relatives) all
die (not at all unusual in earlier times!) AND in the role of sponsors. Sponsors also play a role in new employees,
in AA and many “recovery” programs, etc.
How can sponsors be a blessing?
What not-so-good reasons do people have in sometimes choosing Godparents? How can Godparents be helpful?
No comments:
Post a Comment